Archive for tag: Frome

ASDA in Frome

This is the response I sent in to


I am writing to request that my views are known regarding the proposed extension at ASDA in Frome.

I feel strongly that the proposal requires significant modification or rejection.
I write as a Frome resident and regular user of the store.
It makes a valuable contribution as a food retailer.
I feel the aspect of their proposal to provide a home delivery service is a good innovation that should be applauded and encouraged.
However the increase in homewares and non-food retail is not in the best interests of residents of the town.
Their "when-it's-gone-it's-gone" general promotional method and service delivery best explains the nature of my objection.
There is unquestionably a relationship between their increased provision of non-food sales and closure of similar retailers in the town.
The store in Palmer Street (Kemsley's?) that sold a wide range of good value home ware items closed shortly after ASDA opened and remains unoccupied. They stocked a consistent range of goods and you could rely on the range of items available. However ASDA provide these goods with little or no support or meaningful customer service and items are not consistently stocked, they rarely offer spares or goods that can be maintained but goods that are designed to be disposed in landfill and replaced,.
The range of goods they stock is not driven by the needs of shoppers but the goods they can offer at best profit. They do not stock reliably a range of goods and some times have one thing and some times another. To allow them expand this provision to the detriment of existing providers is to transfer from resilient services for the town to a less reliable range of goods.In the range of books, magazines, music etc. one sees a vastly reduced range of options and so to allow them to expand is to effectively reduce choice where that would lead to the reduction of choice from other outlets that cannot be sustained and so close. These outlets provide an excellent and broad range of services, but they cannot compete on price alone with a multinational giant who have effectively unlimited capital resources.
It is the responsibility Mendip District Council to ensure a sensible level of provision and protect local jobs and businesses from agressive expansion. It is beyond question that once competition is eliminated then the price levels increase and so overall the profit disappears back to the corporate centre and away from local employers. These local employers are typically more responsible to the local community developing their staff skills over a longer term basis and offering a more effective long term commitment to the viability of our community. Jobs are not created in a supermarket they are simply transferred there with a far greater proportion of the profit then leaving the local economy.
In Mendip District Council's own words:
"Due to the numerous foodstore commitments, there is limited capacity to support any additional  (supermarket) floorspace (to 2031)."
On this basis to support a viable local economy and develop a more sustainable future for the town this expansion should be curtailed.
The supermarket just-in-time supply model is highly vulnerable to shocks in the weather, fuel price and import markets and currency fluctuations. As all these factors are  likely to increase over the period from now until 2031 Mendip District Council should be doing all it can to ensure the vitality and effectiveness of the current local heritage and our future as a shopping destination depends upon support for our unique and often exceptional local suppliers. Many businesses in Frome are competing above their weight in national and international markets and deserve all the support of their local councillors.
However development of a home delivery food business is in my opinion logical and sensible as it makes sense for one journey to be fulfilling the needs of many homes shopping requirements, instead of one journey per household shop. Also this will allow many people to use 1 car instead of 2 or have no car at all, as well as enfranchising those with no private transport to avail of the advantages of out of town shopping. This could also bring the benefit of reduced car congestion around the already strained Wallbridge area. Expansion would likely increase the road congestion to the detriment of all users including drivers.
I am not against supermarkets but the provision of supermarkets in our town is already adequate and one of the highest rates of supermarket floor space per capita of all towns in the UK. Local businesses should compete fairly on price and choice with larger multinational businesses. However there are many documented examples of the Wall-mart group not competing fairly. I am not asking for any special advantage to be given to local businesses. I have no particular personal interest in any local retail business other than I greatly enjoy the current range of provision available to me as a shopper. The balance is currently fine and there is no justification to increase the supermarket space available to the town.
I would be grateful if you could keep me informed of any other way I can share my feelings on this matter, or of any advice you can give to me to best make this point as expressed above, and would welcome any questions you have about any of the sources of the argument or facts underlying all the assertions made that can be proven via evidence based studies and many documented cases.
yours sincerely,
John Scott
55 Ashtree Road
Frome BA11 2SE
Creative Content  Coding eXtensibly . 
frome: 01373 473939 mobile: 07938 166101
c3x ltd registered in England & Wales no 7444396

More Trains For Bristol

Anyone who reads my CV will know that listed in my interests is "representing rail travellers as part of the First Great Western Customer Panel". We meet directors of the railway on a quarterly basis and listen to and comment on plans for improvements to the service, usually meeting the MD each year. I represent customers from Freshford, Avoncliffe, Bradford-on-Avon, Trowbridge, Westbury, Melksham, Frome, Bruton, Castle Cary and all stations to Weymouth, including Yeovil Pen Mill and Dorchester West. It's a lively session and surprisingly I'm known for getting a little bit aggitated.

Most of my business is conducted either writing code on the train or travelling to customers sites on the train, where I can give rapid feedback by writing up reports etc. on the way home instead of lots of frustrating driving. As such I travel extensively over the rail network in FGW area, and originally came to Frome & Westbury via a commute from Brighton on the now FGW line, formerly the "Wessex main line". When this service was incorporated into the "Greater Western Franchise" I applied to join the panel to try and ensure the smiley and pleasant service didn't degrade. Many of the people I work with also travels these routes by train and many ad-hoc and informal project meetings occur in this space too.

Just thought I'd share my response to these press release for further comments.

DfT: 8,800 extra spaces for busy trains on key routes


FIRST GREAT WESTERN: Additional Carriages for Bristol

The feedback I've received from other channels also suggests that these numbers are a little bit misleading as they do not take into account the outflow of stock from FGW over a similar time period. However hopefully at least this new stock is more relaible than what we lose.

I'd really value your comments especially if you live in the rail area I represent.

So this is what I wrote to the customer panel in response:

to: customer.panel@firstgroup,com

That's fantastic news.

Just out of interest, it's worth noting a couple of things about the Bath-Bristol-Westbury service that then either terminating at Westbury/Frome or onwards to Weymouth or Portsmouth/Brighton service.

Obviously this was one of the pinch points that caused the vocal protests and "rail fare strikes" some years ago. It has been the case recently that due to frequent stock failures that these trains have recently often been formed of 2 instead of 3 car services and this still causes massive overcrowding and people not being allowed to board on a regular basis.

The over crowding is now to a comparable level to the highly contraversial overcrowding that occurred around the start of the Greater Western Franchise.

So as I say fantastic news.

The other thing that has been really good is the use of trains that have extra carriages between Westbury and Bristol and then these detach for the less busy services onwards to Cheltenham/Worcester etc, or Weymouth/Portsmouth.

However what is really worth noting, the trains that are just shuttling from Bristol / Westbury tend to be more lightly loaded as they don't have the base load of passengers travelling further afield, these passengers tend to have more luggage and bicycles etc. but as these services are relatively infrequent it is these services that have the heaviest load. The stress level is raised further if you try and board a train at Bath Spa which is overcrowded and you know it is 2 hours until the next service, the passenger is far less likely to take no for an answer and then delays ensue whilst passengers scuffle and argue to get on the train, making the whole experience one that denigrates the FGW brand as a whole.

I understand that the reason why there are service gaps of up to 3 hours between trains to Weymouth is due to a lack of stock. Maybe McNulty will lead to the prices for these tickets also increasing - and so making it economically more viable to run more trains without the risk of not breaking even on extra provision of rolling-stock. Frome is a major population centre, compared to other freqeuently served stops such as Bradford-on-Avon, Freshford & Westbury. In Frome there is a strong local will for greener travel but with service pattern of up to 3 hours between trains travel is frequently unviable for many travellers. There is a totally unacceptable gap in the evening service provisions meaning that you either need to depart Bristol at 17:49 or 19:49 (with an unreliable changing option in between and a greatly extended journey time). If it is possible more trains that start/terminate at Westbury should be considered to go from Frome as was previously the case, eg the Trans Wilts train (once a day via Melksham & Chippenham to Swindon) used to start in Frome and there are many Frome based people who travel to these towns but the change at Westbury again makes this route less reliable and more time consuming.

Yeovil is also another major population centre with stong transport demand to Bristol & intermediate stops but with this terrible service pattern. Maybe a train that stopped at Yeovil or Taunton to meet with services that no longer stop at Castle Cary/Westbury to make for a faster journey time.

The travelling experience from Westbury to Exeter in the day time is now woeful with this lack of connection possibilites to Taunton.

It has been stated in the past that more services to Weymouth (via Frome) are not possible due to a lack of units. I hope it can be considered that if there are more units this service provision can be improved.

The use of spare units to travel just between Westbury & Bristol does increase the journey time, sometimes by only a few minutes which is more than acceptable but at certain times of the day it is 25 minutes or more.

The last "before work" train leaves Frome at 8:05 and then there is no service until the 10:15  departure that starts from Weymouth. This then holds at Westbury for 25 minutes timetabled delay and the guard advises people to go to the cafe whilst they wait for the extra carriages to be joined on. So then the journey time to Bristol is significantly extented, and you get to Bristol at nearly noon. Just not a useful service provision for serious business or time constrained travellers.

There would definitely be significant revenue returns from very slight improvements to the service pattern. There are big holes here that need to be filled.

But brilliant news that there is now more stock.